When is a Mayor’s Gala NOT a Mayor’s Gala

Share this post:

In the Town of Caledon a fundraising Gala was held on May 2, 2025 that saw thousands of dollars given out to support a wide variety of very fortunate community organizations, The generosity of the donors is admirable, and the organizations who received funding from the Gala must be very grateful. But the event itself has raised some questions when almost a month later the “Gala” was reported under a different title.

How did an invitation from Mayor Annette Groves to the “Mayor’s Gala 2025: a community fundraiser for 14 community organizations” become, in the gala committee’s invitation, the “Annette Groves Community Gala“? Did what appeared to be a Caledon event turn out to be a private function?. As reported in the May 29th edition of the Caledon Citizen it is called the “Annette Groves Community Gala“. But the online Eventbrite site for ordering tickets to the Mayor’s Gala 2025 carried the following invitation: For the purposes of responsible governance, fiscal transparency and accountability, a little clarification would be appreciated.

Mayor's Gala 2025 Tickets, Fri, May 2, 2025 at 6:00 PM | Eventbrite

You see when a Mayor’s Gala is announced it is assumed, quite rightly, that the Town or City of which the person is Mayor is helping to organize the event. Take for example the City of Ajax which describes it’s annual Gala this way:

“Since the Inaugural Gala in June 2019, the Ajax Mayor’s Gala has raised $1,300,000 net to support organizations making a meaningful impact in our community! In keeping with The Ajax Mayor’s Gala tradition, the purpose of our shared experience is to benefit charitable organizations and not-for-profits doing great work in our community.”

And the tickets aren’t cheap, with five sponsorship levels running from $10,000 to $30,000. Now that’s a lot of fundraising! But for a really big show, mark June 10, 2025 on your calendar! That’s the City of Vaughan Mayor’s Gala. Last year they raised 1.1 million dollars for local organizations. Again attendance isn’t cheap. You can be a Presenting Sponsor for $100,000 all the way down to a Corporate Table for only $5000.

Or, if you don’t have enough to do this pre-Christmas there’s always the Nov 29, 2025 Pickering Mayor’s Gala. The point is that towns and cities are always throwing fundraising events. But you won’t see the Ajax Mayor calling his event the “Shaun Collier Community Gala”, or the Pickering Mayor writing his own boastful article about the “Kevin Ashe Community Gala”, Or the Vaughan Mayor hosting the “Steven Del Duca Community Gala.”

So, what’s so different for the town of Caledon? An event originally titled as a Mayor’s Gala alludes immediately to the Town associated with that Mayor. People buy tickets and make donations based on that relationship. It is a fundraiser guided by the ethics, principles and policies of the Town, open to full financial disclosure and public accountability.

But when it becomes “Joe Schmo’s Community Gala”, not organized by a Town or City, that is a totally different matter. That can be a financial wild west show with money trails leading in all sorts of directions. Well, at least according to fans of Ozark. And the gifts doled out to the various community organizations are not done under the auspices of the Town. These are now personal donations from the Gala organizers.

What’s so odd about this recent Gala in Caledon is that it was clearly advertised on Eventbrite, the online ticket seller, as an “Invitation from Mayor Annette Groves to the Mayor’s Gala 2025” and yet weeks after the event Mayor Annette Groves wrote a glowing report in the local Caledon Citizen,  in her own Mayor’s column, about the “Annette Groves Community Gala

The Town has said they were not involved in the organization of this fundraiser, so who were the organizers of this sold out event? Will there be a full public accounting of all the monies raised, a list of the donors, and how the funds were distributed? If it is not the Town giving out this charitable money, then who? Queries to the Town of Caledon’s Communications Department for clarification were not answered by publication time.

In Caledon’s last municipal election campaign, a mayoralty candidate made this statement: “I believe in responsible government, fiscal transparency and accountability.”

Good words by which to live and lead.

The way I see it.

UPDATE. June 4, 2025, Town of Caledon Communications has responded that, although this is not a Town sponsored event, “This was Mayor Groves’ Annual Community Gala, which she held as a fundraiser to support local organizations doing meaningful work in Caledon.”

So, this event is clearly Annette Groves’ private Community Gala. Stay tuned.

*****

*image from Eventbrite

 

 

UK, France, Canada Full Joint Statement on Gaza

Share this post:

“We strongly oppose the expansion of Israel’s military operations in Gaza. The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable. Yesterday’s announcement that Israel will allow a basic quantity of food into Gaza is wholly inadequate. We call on the Israeli Government to stop its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. This must include engaging with the UN to ensure a return to delivery of aid in line with humanitarian principles. We call on Hamas to release immediately the remaining hostages they have so cruelly held since 7 October 2023.

The Israeli Government’s denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable and risks breaching International Humanitarian Law. We condemn the abhorrent language used recently by members of the Israeli Government, threatening that, in their despair at the destruction of Gaza, civilians will start to relocate. Permanent forced displacement is a breach of international humanitarian law.

Israel suffered a heinous attack on October 7. We have always supported Israel’s right to defend Israelis against terrorism. But this escalation is wholly disproportionate.

We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response.

We oppose any attempt to expand settlements in the West Bank. Israel must halt settlements which are illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians.  We will not hesitate to take further action, including targeted sanctions.

We strongly support the efforts led by the United States, Qatar and Egypt to secure an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. It is a ceasefire, the release of all remaining hostages and a long-term political solution that offer the best hope of ending the agony of the hostages and their families, alleviating the suffering of civilians in Gaza, ending Hamas’ control of Gaza and achieving a pathway to a two-state solution, consistent with the goals of the 18 June conference in New York co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. These negotiations need to succeed, and we must all work towards the implementation of a two-state solution, which is the only way to bring long-lasting peace and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve, and ensure long-term stability in the region.

We will continue to work with the Palestinian Authority, regional partners, Israel and the United States to finalise consensus on arrangements for Gaza’s future, building on the Arab plan. We affirm the important role of the High-level Two-State Solution Conference at the UN in June in building international consensus around this aim. And we are committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this end.”

Offensive is in the Mind of the Beholder

Share this post:

In my days of being provocative as a speaker on environmental issues, I once took the stage wearing a hooded sweatshirt that had emblazoned on its back “UNF*CK the PLANET”. When I finished my keynote, one attendee remarked to me that they found that logo offensive. “Really?” I replied. “What I find offensive is continued habitat alteration, loss of biodiversity, chemical pollution, and accelerated climate change.”

No response.

Recently I pondered that same response when I read criticism about Canada joining the UK and France in condemning the blockage of aid to starving Palestinians. Their statement said: “We will not stand by while the Netanyahu government pursues these egregious actions, If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response.”

Yeah, what I find offensive is not Canada’s response. What I find offensive is the deliberate starvation of 14,000 children. I find that  really f*cking offensive.

The way I see it.

Blood Money, Dark Money and Plutocrats

Share this post:

October 2, 2018. US based Saudi journalist Jamal Khashogi, a critic of the Saudi government, was attacked in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul as he went to finalize his marriage papers. It was later revealed that he had been murdered and dismembered. A team of fifteen Saudi agents, operating under the orders of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, carried out the assassination. Shortly after the brutal murder, Trump’s Secretary of the Treasury, Steven Mnuchin has a meeting with the Crown Prince.

 

May 13, 2025, Crown Prince  Mohammed bin Salman greets President Donald Trump with an elaborate welcoming ceremony usually reserved for kings. Trump, in turn, signs off on the largest defense sales agreement in history worth $142 billion as part of a series of bilateral deals with the Saudis worth $600 billion in investments.

 

In 2012, Chrystia Freeland wrote the brilliant non-fiction novel Plutocrats: the Rise of the New Global Super Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else. In 2016, Jane Mayer wrote an insightful non-fiction novel called Dark Money: the Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right.

On July 27, 2024, campaigning Donald Trump told a group of supporters in Florida that they wouldn’t have to vote again if they elected him President, “You won’t have to do it anymore, It’ll be fixed. It’ll be fine; you won’t have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians.”

Way back in 1986, Canadian songwriter Bruce Cockburn wrote “Call It Democracy”, a scathing indictment of international greed controlled by the high rollers. It starts off with the verse: “Padded with power here they come, International loan sharks backed by the guns, Of market hungry military profiteers, Whose word is a swamp and whose brow is smeared, With the blood of the poor.” Give it a listen with 2025 in mind.

We can’t say we weren’t warned. The way I see it.

*****

  • cartoon by Chris Dywanski
  • Image from the news.com.pk

Lisa Post does NOT Need Strong Mayor Powers

Share this post:

by Skid Crease and Patti Foley, originally published in Just Sayin’ Caledon, May 9/25

***

Lisa Post is the Mayor of Orangeville. Lisa Post believes in consensus building, the strengths of her team, and the integrity of responsible democracy. Lisa Post does NOT want to be a Strong Mayor, a title that was foisted upon her, without consultation, by the provincial government.

Mayor Post expressed her concerns in a letter to Premier Rob Ford and Rob Flack, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, describing what she feels are the negative impacts of Strong Mayor Powers (SMP) on both the democratic process and staff morale.

As confusing as it sounds, the way Bill 3: Strong Mayors, Building Homes Act is written, Mayor Post had to use SMP in order to not use them. She has signed five Mayoral Decisions to delegate certain authorities in order to effectively keep them in the hands of Council, staff, and committees, so that the democratic process is restored.

I asked the Mayor what was the tipping point that inspired such a bold move. She replied, “I pride myself on my ability to build consensus in those times when things are contentious. Our team works best when everyone’s voices and ideas can be represented in policy discussions and decisions.”

Mayor Post had observed other municipalities where the SMP had been abused, and Councils were afraid as they watched their positions of responsibility reduced and, in some cases, removed.

The SMP disempowered both Council and community. Town staff were also afraid, wondering who would be fired next as they watched experienced senior staff gracelessly swept out the door to be replaced by the Strong Mayor’s single source choices.

This simply went against everything in which she believed. Lisa had seen teamwork and consensus building in action back when she was a new councillor on a team of seven under the leadership of then Mayor Sandy Brown. When the pandemic hit, they quickly started online meetings and kept the process of governance going as smoothly as possible. Since the pandemic, in this current term of Council, there have been numerous examples of where consensus building has worked for the betterment of the community.

In 2022 Lisa Post ran for Mayor and won. She values and respects the responsibility that comes with that role. I asked if she felt she would ever regret giving up those Strong Mayor Powers and she responded immediately: “I don’t need Strong Mayor Powers. What I need is a strong community with a strong voice, and I need Council to feel like they are a part of our democracy and that their decisions are respected. Strong Mayor Powers won’t help us build a strong community – If the province wants to help us, the best way they can is with reliable and sustainable investments in infrastructure, homelessness prevention, and transit.”

Additionally, on Monday, May 12th, Mayor Post is bringing a motion to Council: item 14.1 on the agenda, to formally request that the Province of Ontario rescind the ‘Strong Mayors Legislation’ in its entirety and should the legislation not be repealed, that the Province immediately remove the Town of Orangeville from the list of municipalities designated under the Strong Mayor Powers framework. That motion, if approved by Council, will be sent to the Province as well as to all 444 municipalities as well as to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities for their support and endorsement.

The letter to the Province has been sent, the Mayor’s Motion will be discussed, and Orangeville Council, together as a team, will decide their future.

As it should be.

The way I see it.

_______________

*image from You Tube